Entering edit mode
16 months ago
bioinformatics
▴
40
Hi,
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/geo2r/?acc=GSE30929
I have performed DGE analysis between WDLPS and DDLPS tumour samples in R and have the following results table. I ended up with the same results as the GEO2R.
logFC AveExpr t P.Value adj.P.Val B
207175_at -5.7 8.8 -14 3.1e-25 7.0e-21 47
213706_at -3.5 8.9 -14 1.0e-24 1.1e-20 46
203548_s_at -4.7 10.1 -14 2.8e-24 2.1e-20 45
203549_s_at -4.3 10.1 -14 9.0e-24 4.4e-20 43
205913_at -4.5 9.9 -14 9.9e-24 4.4e-20 43
218736_s_at -2.5 8.7 -13 4.3e-23 1.6e-19 42
203571_s_at -4.0 9.3 -13 2.0e-22 6.3e-19 40
49452_at -3.0 9.1 -13 4.3e-22 1.2e-18 40
43427_at -2.8 8.9 -13 5.3e-22 1.3e-18 39
219398_at -3.3 9.6 -13 9.3e-22 2.1e-18 39
However, does the logFC of -5.7 in the first row of the table indicate that the gene is unregulated or down regulated in WDLPS or DDLPS?
Thanks!
I am not sure, I think DDLPS might be the test and WDLPS the control. Is this correct? I just performed a DGE analyses between the two tumour subtypes.
Please show me your
design
table. It looks like you are comparing betweensubtype: dedifferentiated vs subtype: well-differentiated
.Your design in not correct. I suggest you to invest your time to learn this. Please follow the tutorial I have linked here which will help you understand how it is done-
https://sbc.shef.ac.uk/geo_tutorial/tutorial.nb.html
Is this design better? Thanks!
It looks better than what you had before.