Adaptor sequence not present in raw paired-end reads
1
0
Entering edit mode
14 months ago
Petesview ▴ 10

Hi,

I recently downloaded a GEO dataset of paired end reads using SRAtool kit with the fastq-dump command. I performed quality check on these reads using FastQC, there were no overrepresented sequences nor detected adapter content in the raw data. I also manually inspected the bases at the ends of the reads from the Fastq file and no obvious repetitive sequences were observed.

However, the FastQC report indicates that all reads have a consistent length of 100 base pair. This seems quite odd, because after adapter removal, I would expect a range of sequence lengths between the minimum and the maximum. Author mentioned in article that raw reads were trimmed with FASTQ Trimmer (version 1.0.0).

Does FASTQ Trimmer perform absolute sequence length trimming (instead of trimming on known adapter sequences)? Also, were reads already trimmed prior uploading to GEO?

RNA-seq • 705 views
ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode
14 months ago
ATpoint 85k

If the insert size is longer than the read length then you do not expect adaptor contamination. It's perfectly fine to not see adaptors in most standard NGS libraries.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2435 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6