I'm considering conducting a GWAS analysis using the UK Biobank data, which involves a very large cohort of 500,000 participants. In our lab, we've previously used the Hail software for GWAS analysis. However, when I explore research papers that have conducted GWAS using UK Biobank data, it seems like BOLT-LMM is the more commonly used tool, sometimes SAIGE or regenie.
My question is: I wonder if using Hail is enough for GWAS with a very large cohort, or if it would be better to use tools like BOLT-LMM. What are the pros and cons of these tools?
I don't know much about BOLT-LMM, SAIGE, and regenie except that they can analyze very large cohorts. If using Hail is sufficient, I would like to keep using Hail since it will save the time and effort of installing and learning how to use new tools.
This post was maked as spam by biostars filter. I have restored it.