Entering edit mode
15 months ago
Ronin
▴
10
Hi all,
I've got a couple of questions about my output from getDifferentialPeaks.pl in Homer. I have compared two eye samples from different conditions. I am posting a portion of the output file below:
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
#PeakID chr start end strand score focus ratio/other Total Tags Background Tags Fold Change vs. Background p-value | |
VHII01000037.1-56 VHII01000037.1 2086 3306 + 858.9 1220 1588 177.6 8.94 0.00e+00 | |
VHII01000031.1-40 VHII01000031.1 132534 133200 + 669.3 666 1225.5 75.7 16.19 0.00e+00 | |
VHII01000031.1-26 VHII01000031.1 129642 130013 + 196.8 371 361 29.1 12.4 5.54e-253 | |
VHII01000031.1-72 VHII01000031.1 138309 138683 + 148.8 374 269.5 12.1 22.22 7.97e-253 | |
VHII01000037.1-79 VHII01000037.1 1445 1780 + 143.2 335 322 1 331.87 0.00e+00 | |
CM020915.1-2292 CM020915.1 41485917 41486515 + 135.2 598 250.5 25.2 9.93 1.11e-153 | |
VHII01000037.1-182 VHII01000037.1 112451 112695 + 130.8 244 236.5 19.4 12.19 2.87e-164 |
My first question is: How is the focus ratio and score actually calculated -- that is, what exactly is it saying?
And my second question: When I have large focus ratio, but a p-value reading 00e+00, does this mean the p-value is simply too small to be recorded accurately, or that this is actually not a statistically significant peak?
Thank you in advance,