Entering edit mode
9 months ago
Md. Al - Mustanjid
▴
30
Suppose a bibliometric analysis was conducted to uncover new research discoveries, but it was later discovered that similar research had already been carried out. In such a scenario, what would be the appropriate course of action to pursue?
- Shall we update the time intervals?
- Should we update and rewrite both the findings and the article?
Please help with this, thanks in advance.
unrelated to bioinformatics. ask : https://academia.stackexchange.com/
Sorry for this inconvenience.
This post does not fit the theme of this forum.
validate your previous questions that got correct answers (green mark on the left) : What are the differences between Gene Regulatory Network and Protein-Protein Interactions? ; What is the way of getting deferentially expressed genes from Gene expression Omnibus? ; Can I find common genes by comparing one disease's rna-seq dataset with another disease's microarray dataset? ; If I have a ran-seq data of disease A and also rna-seq for disease B on the same platform and If i extracted DEGs from both diseases and find common DEGs; is this analysis ok? ;