Entering edit mode
9 months ago
rheab1230
▴
140
I have a dataset which has independent variable, dependent variable and Mediator. I am trying to measure the direct effect and indirect effect. I am using mediation package in R for doing this.
I followed these steps:
model.M <- lm(M~X,data)
model.Y <- lm(Y~X+M,data)
results <- mediate(model.M,model.Y,sims=500,boot=T,mediator="M",treat="X")
plot(results)
summary(results)
Causal Mediation Analysis
Nonparametric Bootstrap Confidence Intervals with the Percentile Method
Estimate 95% CI Lower 95% CI Upper
ACME -0.184 -0.418 -0.02
ADE 0.808 0.347 1.18
Total Effect 0.624 0.122 1.08
Prop. Mediated -0.295 -1.850 -0.01
p-value
ACME 0.016 *
ADE <2e-16 ***
Total Effect 0.024 *
Prop. Mediated 0.040 *
---
Signif. codes:
0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Sample Size Used: 205
Simulations: 500
After running mediation, I know that if there is mediation the direct effect is reduced or becomes 0 in comparison to total effect But in my case the direct effect is increased: does it mean after controlling for M, M is not a mediator? I am not able to interpret the increased value Can anyone who has done mediation analysis provide any comments/feedback Thank you.