Conditional analysis, direction of effect is changed after conditioning
0
0
Entering edit mode
7 months ago
AMARU • 0

Hi,

I hope you can provide me with some insight into these 2 questions.

Context:

I have a GWAS of a relatively isolated East Asian population. GWAS shows a significant SNP1 associated with this cellular phenotype (E-12). SNP2 is the second top signal (E-07) and is in relatively high LD with SNP1 (LD~ R2=0.78, D'=1). Both SNP1 and SNP2 have positive beta associated with this cellular phenotype.

Conditioning analysis on SNP1 shows an independent second signal (SNP3-SNP7, with high/perfect LD between them) and SNP2 pvalue is E-02 with *negative beta*. Then, I conditioned on SNP2, so pvalue of SNP1 is ~E02 and positive pvalue. This suggests that SNP1 & SNP2 are most likely transmitted together but I can not explain the change in the direction of effect.

  1. Can someone tell me if they have encountered something similar? How can this be explained?

From all SNPs in that gene, I found SNP8 whose pvalue is E-03 with positive beta. Conditioning on SNP1 or SNP2 leads to an increase of the SNP3 signal (pvalue=E-06) and a change in the direction of effect (negative). Conditioning on the SNP8 leads to a huge increase of the SNP1-SNP2 pvalue (~E-15) as well for SNP3-7 (~E15-E-12). SNP1-SNP2 are in strong LD with SNP3, ~r2=0.8.

  1. Is this SNP8 an independent signal? is SNP8 a repressor of SNP1-2 and SNP3-7? how can the change of the effect be interpreted?

Thanks a lot for any advice.

Note: Conditioning of SNP3 seems to increase the signal of SNP1-2 or SNP8. So these SNP3-7 seem to be an independent signal.

GWAS conditioning population analysis genetics • 236 views
ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2577 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6