why would you remove warnings?
FastQC provides a generic overview with pre determined threshold for both warning and failed, which might be not a failed for specific application. below is the command for fastp to trim your reads and you should modified it accordingly. trimmomatic would work too.
Yeah, if you get some adapter or bad reads, without seeing the FastQC report, it is hard to judge the data. It is all about your application and what you are trying to achieve. In PCR-based applications, I would expect GC content to fail or show a warning due to the nature of the enrichment. However, I'll be happy if the amount of reads after deduplication is more than 80%, and I will keep an eye on the mean coverage.
It would be very helpful for us if you could post the FastQC report and explain a bit about your application.
NOTE: Personally, I prefer (and use) Fastp over FastQC.
Thanks a.alnawfal.1992 !
Normally we trim when we have adapters or low quality reads. But in this scenario what do you suggest?
Yeah, if you get some adapter or bad reads, without seeing the FastQC report, it is hard to judge the data. It is all about your application and what you are trying to achieve. In PCR-based applications, I would expect GC content to fail or show a warning due to the nature of the enrichment. However, I'll be happy if the amount of reads after deduplication is more than 80%, and I will keep an eye on the mean coverage.
It would be very helpful for us if you could post the FastQC report and explain a bit about your application.
NOTE: Personally, I prefer (and use) Fastp over FastQC.