Weird looking volcano plot
0
0
Entering edit mode
3 months ago
Harini ▴ 10

Hello!

I am working with a plasma proteomics expression array and my volcano plot for DEA looks a bit atypical. Here is the code that I used (I am a novice coder, so please pardon any poor coding)

volplot1 <- ggplot(data = vol.redB, 
                  aes(x = AVG.Log.Ratio, y = -log10(Protein.Pvalue), 
                        col = diffexpressed, label = delabel)) + 
theme_light() + 
geom_vline(xintercept = c(-0.6, 0.6), col = "black", linetype = "dashed", linewidth = 0.1) + 
geom_hline(yintercept =-log10(0.05), col = "black", linetype = "dashed", linewidth = 0.1) + 
geom_point(size = 0.5) + 
geom_text_repel(size = 3.5, force = 3, max.overlaps = 10, point.size = 10, box.padding = 0.5) + 
scale_color_manual(values = c("#ff595e", "#5e6472", "#ff595e"), label= c("PRE", "", "POST")) + 
labs(
    title = "", 
    x = "log2(FC) - enrichment", 
    y = "-log10(adj.pvalue) - significance", 
    color = "")

This is the "atypical" volcano plot.

Volcano plot - DEA Pre vs Post conditions

I suspect maybe this is because of some missing values in my dataset, although I could be wrong. Any ideas from others for a possible explanation and required fix? Many thanks in advance!

Proteomics Volcano-plot Plasma • 380 views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode

Can you explain what is atypical about the plot? Do you mean that the majority of the points are below threshold? Or something else?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode

Hi!

I think the most important thing is to explain the pre-processing process. Which normalisation method did you use? Was batch correction performed? How did you identify the DEA (which method)?

The volcano plot is just reflecting the results obtained from those previous steps.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2681 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6