Different insertion times from two methods
0
0
Entering edit mode
3 months ago

Dear respected researchers and experts,

I seek your valuable opinions and suggestions. I am calculating NUMT insertion time. I have filtered the NUMT IDs (sequences) using the following criteria: Identity percentage less than 96 and alignment length greater than 7000 bp.

I have used two methods for the calculation:

Method 1:

I ran a script in Python (Pycharm) to calculate Divergence and Divergence Proportion. The formula used for divergence is: Divergence = 100 - Identity percentage.

I already know the substitution rate for the order Orthoptera, which is 13.554 times 10 to the power of -9 substitutions per site per year (subs/s/y). Then, I calculated the insertion time using the following formula: NUMT Insertion Time = Divergence / 2 times Nuclear Substitution Rate.

Method 2:

In this method, I extracted NUMT sequences and aligned them with the mtDNA reference genome using ClustalW in MEGA software. I calculated the P-distance (pairwise difference) and then used the following formula to calculate insertion time: NUMT Insertion Time = P-distance / 2 times Nuclear Substitution Rate.

Both methods give different NUMT insertion times, and I am confused about which one to rely on. Could you provide guidance on this or if I have made any mistakes?

Thank you for your help!

pacBio mtDNA NUMTS • 425 views
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Please do not use bioinformatics as a tag unless your post is about the field of bioinformatics itself. For proper examples, please see Forum and News type posts under https://www.biostars.org/tag/bioinformatics/

I've removed the tag this time but please be more mindful in the future.

ADD REPLY

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1874 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6