Tutorial:Parallel AUGUSTUS Execution via GNU Parallel
2
0
Entering edit mode
6 weeks ago
Vijith ▴ 90

Hi, fellow bioinformaticians,

I recently ran AUGUSTUS for ab initio gene prediction on my 2.6GB plant genome using an 8-core server with 244GB memory.

However, AUGUSTUS utilized only one CPU core, resulting in slow performance (~25MB *.gff3 output per day). After reviewing the AUGUSTUS documentation, I couldn't find a parameter to set the number of CPU cores.

To overcome this, I used GNU parallel to run multiple AUGUSTUS instances in parallel by splitting the main FASTA file into chunks corresponding to the number of cores. I've documented my protocol in a tutorial on my page and would love to share it with the community.

Are there alternative methods to make AUGUSTUS utilize multiple cores? Please share your insights. Link to tutorial: [https://lifescienceshub.wixsite.com/lifesciencehub/post/how-to-leverage-gnu-parallel-to-utilize-multiple-cores-while-running-augustus\] image

augustus genome ngs parallel • 640 views
ADD COMMENT
2
Entering edit mode
6 weeks ago

Nice, but you'd better learn to use a workflow manager like snakemake or nextflow. See NF below (not tested):

workflow {
        ch0 = Channel.fromPath(params.fasta)
    ch1 = FAIDX(ch0).output
    ch2 = ch1.splitCsv(header:false,sep:'\t').map{it[0]}
    ch3 = APPLY_AUGUSTUS(ch1.combine(ch0).combine(ch2))
    MERGE(ch3.output.collect())
}


process FAIDX {
input:
    path(fasta)
output:
    tuple path("*.fai"),emit:output
script:
"""
samtools faidx ${fasta}
"""
}

process APPLY_AUGUSTUS {
input:
    tuple path(fai),path(fasta),val(contig)
output:
    path("${contig}.gff3"),emit:output
script:
"""
samtools faidx ${fasta} ${contig} > tmp.fa
augustus --species=maize --progress=true --gff3=on tmp.fa > "${contig}.gff3"
rm tmp.Fa
"""
}


process MERGE {
input:
    path(gff3)
output:
    path("final.output.gff3"),emit:output
script:
"""
cat ${gff3} > final.output.gff3
"""
}
ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode

Thank you so much, Dr. Lindenbaum, for the valuable comment. I'm not quite experienced in nextflow, but I like to test this out. Can you provide some details about this code, or any resources to understand it?

ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
ADD REPLY
2
Entering edit mode
6 weeks ago
ole.tange ★ 4.5k

Instead of making a python script for splitting, you can use --block -1 --pipe-part --cat --recend "\n" --recstart ">":

parallel --block -1 -a big.fasta --pipepart --cat --recend "\n" --recstart ">" augustus [...] {}

This will automatically split the fasta file into 1 chunk per CPU thread. It will save the chunks into temporary files before calling augustus.

If augustus can read from stdin (e.g. by: augustus -) you can bypass generating the temporary files:

parallel --block -1 -a big.fasta --pipepart --recend "\n" --recstart ">" augustus [...] -

If augustus has very varying runtime, it might make sense to split big.fasta into more chunks, say, 3 per CPU thread: --block -3 This if a single chunk takes forever, then the other CPU threads will pick up the other chunks.

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 2324 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6