Hi everyone,
I am working with DiffBind to analyze ATAC-seq data, specifically using peaks generated by HMMRATAC. I ran the dba.count()
function with the following parameters:
dba_obj <- dba.count(dba_obj, bUseSummarizeOverlaps = TRUE, summits = 75)
However, I am encountering the following error:
Error: No sites have activity greater than filter value.
I tried increasing the summits
parameter, but the error persists. Interestingly, when I set bUseSummarizeOverlaps = FALSE
, the error does not appear, and DiffBind proceeds with counting without any issues.
My questions are:
Does setting
bUseSummarizeOverlaps = FALSE
significantly impact the accuracy or validity of my results?I understand thatSummarizeOverlaps
generally provides more stringent counting, but I’m unsure how crucial this setting is for ATAC-seq data analysis, particularly with peaks from HMMRATAC.Are there any alternative ways to troubleshoot or modify settings that might resolve this error without disabling
bUseSummarizeOverlaps
?
Any guidance on whether or not to keep bUseSummarizeOverlaps
enabled, or on alternative approaches to overcome this issue, would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your help!