Quantification And Comparison Of Chip-Seq Peaks
5
3
Entering edit mode
13.3 years ago
Ying W ★ 4.3k

I have two chip-seq experiments under two conditions. I was wondering if it was possible to say that a peak is 'bigger' in one condition versus the other and if there is software that will quantify the difference. Current chip-seq peak callers seem to just say if there is a peak or not.

Thanks

chip-seq differential • 11k views
ADD COMMENT
3
Entering edit mode
13.3 years ago

One option is to use DESeq to analyse count data from the Chip-seq summits in your two conditions and test for differential intensity:

http://www-huber.embl.de/users/anders/DESeq/

ADD COMMENT
1
Entering edit mode

@avilella +1 I have been using DESeq for ChIP-seq data (comparing read counts over two replicates of two time points [4 samples]). Apparently there is a GLM model that will allow the input control read counts to be factored in... Have you looked at this?

ADD REPLY
1
Entering edit mode
13.3 years ago
Ian 6.1k

You could also try DIME or EdgeR.

I am currently trying DESeq, which seems to be producing sensible results. I am going to try DIME next as a comparison.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
13.3 years ago
Ying W ★ 4.3k

Thanks, I will give DESeq a try,

I have found a paper that seems to address this issue but approaches it in an entirely different way

"Identifying dispersed epigenomic domains from ChIP-Seq data." http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21325299

Their software RSEG can be found here: http://smithlab.cmb.usc.edu/histone/rseg/

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
13.3 years ago
Ziegfeld • 0

Also SICER. Rseg runs slower than SICER. You may want to use ChIPDiff which uses HMM and could be fed the output -island.bed files. You can tune confidence% and "fold change" parameters to solve your problem.

ADD COMMENT
0
Entering edit mode
10.9 years ago
dnaseiseq ▴ 220

Bailey T, Krajewski P, Ladunga I, Lefebvre C, Li Q, et al. (2013) Practical Guidelines for the Comprehensive Analysis of ChIP-seq Data. PLoS Comput Biol 9(11): e1003326. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003326

http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003326

ADD COMMENT

Login before adding your answer.

Traffic: 1767 users visited in the last hour
Help About
FAQ
Access RSS
API
Stats

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.

Powered by the version 2.3.6